GU
GU is a casual clothing brand originating in Japan, founded in 2006 by GU Co., Ltd., which is wholly owned by Fast Retailing. It plans, manufactures, and sells clothing and accessories for women, men, and children, offering trend-driven ite...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Polished & dressy · Minimal & basics
Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy · Luxury & heritage
GU shows a stronger emphasis
Mateo shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | United States |
| Founded | 2006 | 2009 |
| Category | Clothing | Accessories |
| Other categories | Bags Accessories Footwear Lifestyle products | Bags Fragrance Lifestyle products |
— indicates information that is not available.
GU is a casual clothing brand originating in Japan, founded in 2006 by GU Co., Ltd., which is wholly owned by Fast Retailing. It plans, manufactures, and sells clothing and accessories for women, men, and children, offering trend-driven ite...
Mateo is a fine jewelry brand founded in New York in March 2009 by Matthew Harris, who is from Jamaica. It began with men's jewelry and is developed around the idea of a toolbox for working men and inspiration from contemporary art, with a...
The brands share refined everyday staples.
The brands share connections to youth culture and menswear.
The brands share connections to youth culture and refined everyday staples.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share designer-led expression and perceived quality.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share distinctive designs and perceived quality.
The brands share minimal design.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share traits or product categories.
The brands share distinctive designs and original design.
The brands share distinctive designs.