SUBU
SUBU is a footwear brand founded in Tokyo in 2016. Toshihiko Fukawa serves as director and designer, and the brand proposes “winter sandals” that can be worn barefoot in cold weather. Its main offerings are indoor-outdoor slipper sandals fe...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Outdoor & functional · Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy
Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy · Luxury & heritage
SUBU shows a stronger emphasis
Mateo shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | United States |
| Founded | 2016 | 2009 |
| Category | Footwear | Accessories |
| Other categories | — | Bags Fragrance Lifestyle products |
— indicates information that is not available.
SUBU is a footwear brand founded in Tokyo in 2016. Toshihiko Fukawa serves as director and designer, and the brand proposes “winter sandals” that can be worn barefoot in cold weather. Its main offerings are indoor-outdoor slipper sandals fe...
Mateo is a fine jewelry brand founded in New York in March 2009 by Matthew Harris, who is from Jamaica. It began with men's jewelry and is developed around the idea of a toolbox for working men and inspiration from contemporary art, with a...
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share distinctive designs and refined everyday staples.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share designer-led expression and perceived quality.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share distinctive designs and perceived quality.
The brands share minimal design.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share traits or product categories.
The brands share distinctive designs and original design.
The brands share distinctive designs.