SUBU
SUBU is a footwear brand founded in Tokyo in 2016. Toshihiko Fukawa serves as director and designer, and the brand proposes “winter sandals” that can be worn barefoot in cold weather. Its main offerings are indoor-outdoor slipper sandals fe...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Outdoor & functional · Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy
Outdoor & functional · Streetwear
SUBU shows a stronger emphasis
SUBU shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 2016 | 1985 |
| Category | Footwear | Clothing |
| Other categories | — | Lifestyle products |
— indicates information that is not available.
SUBU is a footwear brand founded in Tokyo in 2016. Toshihiko Fukawa serves as director and designer, and the brand proposes “winter sandals” that can be worn barefoot in cold weather. Its main offerings are indoor-outdoor slipper sandals fe...
Arktis is a functional clothing and equipment brand for military, tactical, and outdoor use, founded in the UK in 1985 by a former Royal Marine Commando. It primarily offers smocks, jackets, tactical vests, and other gear for use by the mil...
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share distinctive designs and refined everyday staples.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share workwear influences and outdoor influences.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share distinctive designs and functional design.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share functional design and perceived quality.
The brands share distinctive designs and connections to subcultures.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share connections to subcultures and functional design.