Makumo
makumo is a textile brand launched in Fukuoka in 2010 by textile designer Miki Fukuyama. Based at a seaside atelier in Itoshima, Fukuoka Prefecture, Fukuyama, her husband Tomota Araki, who handles dyeing and printing, and yukiko, who works...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Decoration & playfulness · Avant-garde & designer · Sporty & sportswear
Sporty & sportswear · Outdoor & functional
Billabong shows a stronger emphasis
Makumo shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | Australia |
| Founded | 2010 | 1973 |
| Category | Textiles and material technology | Clothing |
| Other categories | Clothing Bags Lifestyle products | Bags Accessories Footwear Eyewear |
— indicates information that is not available.
makumo is a textile brand launched in Fukuoka in 2010 by textile designer Miki Fukuyama. Based at a seaside atelier in Itoshima, Fukuoka Prefecture, Fukuyama, her husband Tomota Araki, who handles dyeing and printing, and yukiko, who works...
Billabong is a surfwear brand founded in 1973 by Gordon Merchant and Rena Merchant on Australia's Gold Coast. Originating with boardshorts, it offers surf-inspired apparel, swimwear, wetsuits, accessories, and more. The brand balances perfo...
The brands share distinctive designs and connections to subcultures.
The brands share connections to subcultures and spring and summer styles.
The brands share concept-driven design and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share concept-driven design and sports influences.
The brands share sports influences and value for money.
The brands share connections to subcultures and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and value for money.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and value for money.
The brands share distinctive designs and connections to subcultures.