Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy · Streetwear
Decoration & playfulness · Avant-garde & designer · Luxury & heritage
Common Projects shows a stronger emphasis
Matthew Williamson shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | United States | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 2004 | 1997 |
| Category | Footwear | Clothing |
| Other categories | — | Lifestyle products Textiles and material technology |
— indicates information that is not available.
Common Projects is an American footwear brand founded in New York in 2004 by Prathan Poopat and Flavio Girolami. Starting with the perfect sneaker, it offers sneakers, boots, and loafers centered on a minimalist aesthetic, Italian craftsman...
Matthew Williamson is a brand founded in London, United Kingdom, in 1997 by designer Matthew Williamson and his business partner Joseph Veroza. Initially, it operated primarily as a womenswear fashion brand and became known for its bold use...
The brands share minimal design and unisex collections.
The brands share distinctive designs and original design.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share distinctive designs and original design.
The brands share distinctive designs and menswear.
The brands share refined everyday staples and original design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and distinctive designs.
The brands share refined everyday staples and menswear.
The brands share refined everyday staples and distinctive designs.
The brands share unisex collections.
The brands share perceived quality and attention to materials and craftsmanship.
The brands share distinctive designs and designer-led expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and designer-led expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and designer-led expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and designer-led expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and designer-led expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and designer-led expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and designer-led expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and designer-led expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and designer-led expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and designer-led expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and decorative expression.
The brands share designer-led expression and decorative expression.