Crocs
Crocs is a footwear brand launched in Colorado, U.S., in 2002 by Scott Seamans, Lyndon “Duke” Hanson, George Boedecker Jr., and others. Centered on lightweight, cushioned clogs made from its proprietary Croslite material, the brand offers s...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Decoration & playfulness · Outdoor & functional
Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy · Luxury & heritage
Mateo shows a stronger emphasis
Crocs shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2002 | 2009 |
| Category | Footwear | Accessories |
| Other categories | Accessories | Bags Fragrance Lifestyle products |
— indicates information that is not available.
Crocs is a footwear brand launched in Colorado, U.S., in 2002 by Scott Seamans, Lyndon “Duke” Hanson, George Boedecker Jr., and others. Centered on lightweight, cushioned clogs made from its proprietary Croslite material, the brand offers s...
Mateo is a fine jewelry brand founded in New York in March 2009 by Matthew Harris, who is from Jamaica. It began with men's jewelry and is developed around the idea of a toolbox for working men and inspiration from contemporary art, with a...
The brands share distinctive designs and playful expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and original design.
The brands share value for money and perceived quality.
The brands share distinctive designs and unisex collections.
The brands share distinctive designs and unisex collections.
The brands share unisex collections and original design.
The brands share connections to youth culture and perceived quality.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share designer-led expression and perceived quality.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share distinctive designs and perceived quality.
The brands share minimal design.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share traits or product categories.
The brands share distinctive designs and original design.
The brands share distinctive designs.