MASU
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Decoration & playfulness · Streetwear
Sporty & sportswear · Streetwear
PONY shows a stronger emphasis
MASU shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | United States |
| Founded | 2016 | 1972 |
| Category | Clothing | Footwear |
| Other categories | Accessories | Clothing |
— indicates information that is not available.
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
PONY is a footwear and apparel brand founded in New York City in 1972 by Roberto Muller. The brand name is an acronym for “Product of New York.” Initially focused on athletic shoes, PONY was widely adopted in sports such as boxing and baske...
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.