PONY
PONY is a footwear and apparel brand founded in New York City in 1972 by Roberto Muller. The brand name is an acronym for “Product of New York.” Initially focused on athletic shoes, PONY was widely adopted in sports such as boxing and baske...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Sporty & sportswear · Streetwear
Sporty & sportswear · Outdoor & functional · Polished & dressy
PONY shows a stronger emphasis
BROOKS shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1972 | 1914 |
| Category | Footwear | Footwear |
| Other categories | Clothing | Clothing Accessories |
— indicates information that is not available.
PONY is a footwear and apparel brand founded in New York City in 1972 by Roberto Muller. The brand name is an acronym for “Product of New York.” Initially focused on athletic shoes, PONY was widely adopted in sports such as boxing and baske...
BROOKS is a running-focused brand founded in Philadelphia, USA, in 1914. Now based in Seattle, it offers running shoes, apparel, sports bras, and accessories worldwide. A subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, it continues to pursue research and...
The brands share refined everyday staples and sports influences.
The brands share refined everyday staples and sports influences.
The brands share sports influences and functional design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and sports influences.
The brands share sports influences and perceived quality.
The brands share sports influences and functional design.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share refined everyday staples and sports influences.
The brands share functional design and perceived quality.
The brands share distinctive designs and value for money.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and perceived quality.