MASU
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Decoration & playfulness · Streetwear
Outdoor & functional · Streetwear
Arktis shows a stronger emphasis
MASU shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 2016 | 1985 |
| Category | Clothing | Clothing |
| Other categories | Accessories | Lifestyle products |
— indicates information that is not available.
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
Arktis is a functional clothing and equipment brand for military, tactical, and outdoor use, founded in the UK in 1985 by a former Royal Marine Commando. It primarily offers smocks, jackets, tactical vests, and other gear for use by the mil...
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share workwear influences and outdoor influences.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share distinctive designs and functional design.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share functional design and perceived quality.
The brands share distinctive designs and connections to subcultures.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share connections to subcultures and functional design.