MASU
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Decoration & playfulness · Streetwear
Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy · Streetwear
Etq. shows a stronger emphasis
MASU shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | Netherlands |
| Founded | 2016 | 2010 |
| Category | Clothing | Footwear |
| Other categories | Accessories | Clothing Eyewear |
— indicates information that is not available.
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
ETQ is a footwear and apparel brand founded in 2010 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, by Patrick van der Woude and Hugo Castermans. Co-founder Patrick van der Woude leads the creative direction, and the brand offers quality-focused wardrobe es...
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share minimal design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share perceived quality and value for money.
The brands share refined everyday staples and distinctive designs.
The brands share minimal design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share refined everyday staples and menswear.
The brands share minimal design and distinctive designs.
The brands share minimal design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share refined everyday staples and menswear.
The brands share minimal design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share refined everyday staples and distinctive designs.
The brands share minimal design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share refined everyday staples and menswear.