Crocs
Crocs is a footwear brand launched in Colorado, U.S., in 2002 by Scott Seamans, Lyndon “Duke” Hanson, George Boedecker Jr., and others. Centered on lightweight, cushioned clogs made from its proprietary Croslite material, the brand offers s...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Decoration & playfulness · Outdoor & functional
Outdoor & functional · Streetwear
Arktis shows a stronger emphasis
Crocs shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | United States | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 2002 | 1985 |
| Category | Footwear | Clothing |
| Other categories | Accessories | Lifestyle products |
— indicates information that is not available.
Crocs is a footwear brand launched in Colorado, U.S., in 2002 by Scott Seamans, Lyndon “Duke” Hanson, George Boedecker Jr., and others. Centered on lightweight, cushioned clogs made from its proprietary Croslite material, the brand offers s...
Arktis is a functional clothing and equipment brand for military, tactical, and outdoor use, founded in the UK in 1985 by a former Royal Marine Commando. It primarily offers smocks, jackets, tactical vests, and other gear for use by the mil...
The brands share distinctive designs and playful expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and original design.
The brands share value for money and perceived quality.
The brands share distinctive designs and unisex collections.
The brands share distinctive designs and unisex collections.
The brands share unisex collections and original design.
The brands share connections to youth culture and perceived quality.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share workwear influences and outdoor influences.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share distinctive designs and functional design.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share functional design and perceived quality.
The brands share distinctive designs and connections to subcultures.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share connections to subcultures and functional design.