MASU
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Decoration & playfulness · Streetwear
Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy
Filippa K shows a stronger emphasis
MASU shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | Sweden |
| Founded | 2016 | 1993 |
| Category | Clothing | Clothing |
| Other categories | Accessories | — |
— indicates information that is not available.
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
Filippa K is a fashion brand founded in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1993 by Filippa Knutsson and two others. Centered on essential wardrobes for women and men, it makes clothes designed to last and officially promotes “mindful consumption.” It cu...
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share refined everyday staples and minimal design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and minimal design.
The brands share concept-driven design and womenswear.
The brands share refined everyday staples and minimal design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and minimal design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and minimal design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and concept-driven design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and minimal design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and concept-driven design.
The brands share minimal design and concept-driven design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and minimal design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and minimal design.