MASU
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Decoration & playfulness · Streetwear
Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy
MASU shows a stronger emphasis
MASU shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Founded | 2016 | 1982 |
| Category | Clothing | Clothing |
| Other categories | Accessories | Textiles and material technology |
— indicates information that is not available.
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
Plantation is a Japanese fashion brand launched by Issey Miyake in spring 1982. Centered on the idea that “clothing is a tool for living,” it offers everyday wear focused on natural materials, making use of the natural texture of fabrics, a...
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share concept-driven design and unisex collections.
The brands share refined everyday staples and attention to materials and craftsmanship.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share concept-driven design and unisex collections.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share attention to materials and craftsmanship and perceived quality.
The brands share refined everyday staples and attention to materials and craftsmanship.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share concept-driven design and attention to materials and craftsmanship.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.