Timex
Timex, a watch brand, was founded in 1854 in Waterbury, Connecticut, USA, as the Waterbury Clock Company by brass manufacturer Benedict & Burnham. It continues to operate under Timex Group and offers a wide range of collections, centered on...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Sporty & sportswear · Outdoor & functional · Minimal & basics
Sporty & sportswear · Outdoor & functional
Timex shows a stronger emphasis
Timex shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | United States | Australia |
| Founded | 1854 | 1973 |
| Category | Watches | Clothing |
| Other categories | Accessories | Bags Accessories Footwear Eyewear |
— indicates information that is not available.
Timex, a watch brand, was founded in 1854 in Waterbury, Connecticut, USA, as the Waterbury Clock Company by brass manufacturer Benedict & Burnham. It continues to operate under Timex Group and offers a wide range of collections, centered on...
Billabong is a surfwear brand founded in 1973 by Gordon Merchant and Rena Merchant on Australia's Gold Coast. Originating with boardshorts, it offers surf-inspired apparel, swimwear, wetsuits, accessories, and more. The brand balances perfo...
The brands share interest in archival pieces and distinctive designs.
The brands share distinctive designs and connections to subcultures.
The brands share connections to subcultures and spring and summer styles.
The brands share concept-driven design and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share concept-driven design and sports influences.
The brands share sports influences and value for money.
The brands share connections to subcultures and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and value for money.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and value for money.
The brands share distinctive designs and connections to subcultures.