Crocs
Crocs is a footwear brand launched in Colorado, U.S., in 2002 by Scott Seamans, Lyndon “Duke” Hanson, George Boedecker Jr., and others. Centered on lightweight, cushioned clogs made from its proprietary Croslite material, the brand offers s...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Decoration & playfulness · Outdoor & functional
Sporty & sportswear · Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy
emmi shows a stronger emphasis
emmi shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | United States | Japan |
| Founded | 2002 | 2015 |
| Category | Footwear | Clothing |
| Other categories | Accessories | Footwear Lifestyle products |
— indicates information that is not available.
Crocs is a footwear brand launched in Colorado, U.S., in 2002 by Scott Seamans, Lyndon “Duke” Hanson, George Boedecker Jr., and others. Centered on lightweight, cushioned clogs made from its proprietary Croslite material, the brand offers s...
emmi is a Japanese womenswear brand launched by MASH Sports Lab for the Spring/Summer 2015 season. Its brand concept is “Clear Mode,” and its collections center on basic, refined daily wear and wellness, training, and yoga wear incorporatin...
The brands share distinctive designs and playful expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and original design.
The brands share value for money and perceived quality.
The brands share distinctive designs and unisex collections.
The brands share distinctive designs and unisex collections.
The brands share unisex collections and original design.
The brands share connections to youth culture and perceived quality.
The brands share refined everyday staples and value for money.
The brands share refined everyday staples and minimal design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and concept-driven design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and concept-driven design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and concept-driven design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and concept-driven design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and perceived quality.
The brands share concept-driven design and minimal design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and concept-driven design.
The brands share concept-driven design and minimal design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and concept-driven design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and concept-driven design.