FRGMT
FRGMT is a design label and project launched by Hiroshi Fujiwara in Tokyo in 2003. Using its lightning bolt logo as an emblem, it works primarily in fashion-related product design and creative direction, while also spanning music, art, and...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Streetwear · Minimal & basics · Trends & youth culture
Outdoor & functional · Sporty & sportswear · Polished & dressy
Roots shows a stronger emphasis
FRGMT shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | Canada |
| Founded | 2003 | 1973 |
| Category | Clothing | Clothing |
| Other categories | Lifestyle products Art projects | Bags Accessories Footwear Lifestyle products |
— indicates information that is not available.
FRGMT is a design label and project launched by Hiroshi Fujiwara in Tokyo in 2003. Using its lightning bolt logo as an emblem, it works primarily in fashion-related product design and creative direction, while also spanning music, art, and...
Roots is a lifestyle brand founded in Toronto, Canada, in 1973 by Michael Budman and Don Green. With apparel for women, men, and children as its main focus, it offers a wide range of products, including leather goods, footwear, accessories,...
The brands share designer-led expression and concept-driven design.
The brands share designer-led expression and concept-driven design.
The brands share designer-led expression and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and connections to subcultures.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share designer-led expression and concept-driven design.
The brands share designer-led expression and concept-driven design.
The brands share designer-led expression and concept-driven design.
The brands share designer-led expression and concept-driven design.
The brands share designer-led expression and concept-driven design.
The brands share designer-led expression and concept-driven design.
The brands share designer-led expression and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and refined everyday staples.
The brands share distinctive designs and refined everyday staples.
The brands share distinctive designs and refined everyday staples.
The brands share distinctive designs and refined everyday staples.
The brands share distinctive designs and refined everyday staples.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and concept-driven design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and attention to materials and craftsmanship.