MASU
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Decoration & playfulness · Streetwear
Outdoor & functional · Sporty & sportswear · Minimal & basics
icebreaker shows a stronger emphasis
MASU shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | New Zealand |
| Founded | 2016 | 1995 |
| Category | Clothing | Clothing |
| Other categories | Accessories | — |
— indicates information that is not available.
MASU is a Japanese menswear ready-to-wear brand launched in 2016. Its name derives from “masu,” a polite Japanese verb ending, and it is guided by the concept “masu / product”: redefining elements shaped by fixed notions to create new mass...
icebreaker, founded by Jeremy Moon in New Zealand in 1995, is an outdoor/performance wear brand centered on merino wool. Its products are designed in Stabio, Switzerland, and its range includes base layers, socks, underwear, midlayers, and...
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share designer-led expression and distinctive designs.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and interest in archival pieces.
The brands share concept-driven design and designer-led expression.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share outdoor influences and functional design.
The brands share refined everyday staples and outdoor influences.
The brands share concept-driven design and outdoor influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share concept-driven design and perceived quality.
The brands share distinctive designs and outdoor influences.
The brands share concept-driven design and outdoor influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.