SUBU
SUBU is a footwear brand founded in Tokyo in 2016. Toshihiko Fukawa serves as director and designer, and the brand proposes “winter sandals” that can be worn barefoot in cold weather. Its main offerings are indoor-outdoor slipper sandals fe...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Outdoor & functional · Minimal & basics · Polished & dressy
Sporty & sportswear · Outdoor & functional · Polished & dressy
Under Armour shows a stronger emphasis
SUBU shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Japan | United States |
| Founded | 2016 | 1996 |
| Category | Footwear | Clothing |
| Other categories | — | Bags Accessories Footwear Textiles and material technology |
— indicates information that is not available.
SUBU is a footwear brand founded in Tokyo in 2016. Toshihiko Fukawa serves as director and designer, and the brand proposes “winter sandals” that can be worn barefoot in cold weather. Its main offerings are indoor-outdoor slipper sandals fe...
Under Armour was founded by Kevin Plank in Washington, D.C., USA, in 1996 and is currently headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland. It is a sports performance brand with functional apparel at its core, offering apparel for training, running, a...
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share distinctive designs and refined everyday staples.
The brands share concept-driven design and refined everyday staples.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share functional design and value for money.
The brands share concept-driven design and functional design.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share concept-driven design and functional design.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share concept-driven design and functional design.