Crocs
Crocs is a footwear brand launched in Colorado, U.S., in 2002 by Scott Seamans, Lyndon “Duke” Hanson, George Boedecker Jr., and others. Centered on lightweight, cushioned clogs made from its proprietary Croslite material, the brand offers s...
Compare brand traits, similarities and differences.
Trends & youth culture · Decoration & playfulness · Outdoor & functional
Sporty & sportswear · Outdoor & functional · Polished & dressy
Under Armour shows a stronger emphasis
Crocs shows a stronger emphasis
This pair is not included in the similar brands recommendations.
Traits farther from the centre are more prominent within each brand. The chart uses the same relative display as the brand profile. Area does not indicate brand quality or absolute differences between brands.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2002 | 1996 |
| Category | Footwear | Clothing |
| Other categories | Accessories | Bags Accessories Footwear Textiles and material technology |
— indicates information that is not available.
Crocs is a footwear brand launched in Colorado, U.S., in 2002 by Scott Seamans, Lyndon “Duke” Hanson, George Boedecker Jr., and others. Centered on lightweight, cushioned clogs made from its proprietary Croslite material, the brand offers s...
Under Armour was founded by Kevin Plank in Washington, D.C., USA, in 1996 and is currently headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland. It is a sports performance brand with functional apparel at its core, offering apparel for training, running, a...
The brands share distinctive designs and playful expression.
The brands share distinctive designs and original design.
The brands share value for money and perceived quality.
The brands share distinctive designs and unisex collections.
The brands share distinctive designs and unisex collections.
The brands share unisex collections and original design.
The brands share connections to youth culture and perceived quality.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share functional design and value for money.
The brands share concept-driven design and functional design.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share concept-driven design and functional design.
The brands share distinctive designs and concept-driven design.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share distinctive designs and sports influences.
The brands share concept-driven design and functional design.